Skip to content

Increase probe-timeout to avoid CrashloopBackoff#2997

Closed
sathieu wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:masterfrom
sathieu:probetimeout
Closed

Increase probe-timeout to avoid CrashloopBackoff#2997
sathieu wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:masterfrom
sathieu:probetimeout

Conversation

@sathieu
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sathieu sathieu commented Aug 21, 2024

Also ensure probe-timeout of the liveness-probe container is shorter than livenessProbe of the vsphere-csi-node container (5s)

What this PR does / why we need it:

Without this, if the socket probe takes too long, another livenessProbe check is started while the previous is not finished. Liveness probe requests pile up until the container liveness-probe failed in CrashLoopBackoff

Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close that issue when PR gets merged): fixes #

Testing done:

Yes (deployed since a few months)

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Increase probe-timeout to avoid CrashloopBackoff

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from xing-yang August 21, 2024 14:41
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Welcome @sathieu!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/vsphere-csi-driver 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/vsphere-csi-driver has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @sathieu. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 21, 2024
@sathieu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

sathieu commented Aug 21, 2024

Answering @divyenpatel questions at #2931 (review)

@jacen57 do you think this needs to updated in the documentation here - https://github.com/kubernetes-csi/livenessprobe?tab=readme-ov-file#command-line-options

Probably. A lot of drivers override this timeout to at least 3s. See here and here. azure-lustre up to 120s!

Can you update this for other liveness-probe container in the same file? https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/vsphere-csi-driver/blob/ed4a34ac281bc907825f73466eab5a38a4374c6b/manifests/vanilla/vsphere-csi-driver.yaml#L532C17-L533

Done.

@sathieu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

sathieu commented Aug 21, 2024

I created kubernetes-csi/livenessprobe#293 to discuss changing the default:

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 19, 2024
@sathieu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

sathieu commented Nov 19, 2024

this is not stale. Just waiting for review.

@sathieu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

sathieu commented Nov 19, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 19, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 17, 2025
@sathieu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

sathieu commented Mar 1, 2025

Not stale.

@sathieu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

sathieu commented Mar 1, 2025

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Mar 1, 2025
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 3, 2025
Also ensure probe-timeout of the liveness-probe container is
shorter than livenessProbe of the vsphere-csi-node container (5s)

Co-Authored-By: Maurice Grivel <maurice.grivel@insee.fr>
Co-Authored-By: Mathieu Parent <mathieu.parent@insee.fr>
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sathieu
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign chethanv28 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 16, 2025
@sathieu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

sathieu commented Jun 16, 2025

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 16, 2025
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 14, 2025
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Oct 14, 2025
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this PR with /reopen
  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this PR with /reopen
  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants